In a landmark decision on September 18, 2024, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly passed a resolution demanding that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The vote, which saw 124 countries in favor, 14 against, and 43 abstaining, marked a significant push for Israel to comply with international law and withdraw from lands it has occupied since 1967, including the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The resolution follows an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which declared Israel’s continued presence in these territories as unlawful. The resolution calls for Israel to immediately halt its settlement activity, dismantle parts of the separation wall, and return land, cultural property, and assets seized since the occupation began.
The resolution also demands reparations for Palestinians affected by the occupation, calling for an international mechanism to address damage and loss caused by Israel’s actions. It urges Israel to allow Palestinians displaced during the occupation to return to their homes and make reparations for injuries suffered due to its policies.
Moreover, the UN text pushes for accountability, asking that Israel bear the legal consequences of all its actions, including violations of international humanitarian law. In particular, it calls for reparations linked to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which has highlighted racial segregation and apartheid practices in the region.
Among the 14 nations that opposed the resolution were Israel’s key ally, the United States, along with countries like Canada and Australia. These nations have historically maintained strong diplomatic relations with Israel, often supporting its stance in international forums.
The resolution’s passage is seen as a significant diplomatic loss for Israel, but those who voted against or abstained argue that the decision could undermine peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine. U.S. representatives voiced concerns that the resolution could increase polarization in the region rather than pave the way for meaningful dialogue.
The resolution includes provisions for convening an international conference aimed at implementing the two-state solution. It also encourages UN member states to take concrete actions to counter Israel’s occupation, such as banning the importation of products from Israeli settlements and ceasing military assistance to Israel in cases where weapons may be used in the Occupied Territories.
The resolution goes a step further, urging member states to impose sanctions on individuals and companies that support or sustain Israel’s settlement activity, including travel bans and asset freezes.
The UN’s demand for Israel to end its occupation has reignited global debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While the resolution is non-binding, its passage increases international pressure on Israel and signals growing frustration with the status quo. For Palestinian advocates, the vote represents a victory in their ongoing fight for sovereignty and self-determination.
However, the road to resolution remains fraught with challenges, as Israel has consistently rejected UN calls to withdraw from the occupied territories, citing security concerns and historical claims to the land. With mounting international pressure and calls for accountability, the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains uncertain, though the UN resolution signals a renewed global effort to seek justice for Palestinians. As the UN continues to push for compliance, all eyes will be on Israel’s next move and how the international community navigates this contentious issue.
Ennywealth