In a dramatic twist involving the Nigerian crossdresser and social media influencer Bobrisky and the activist known as VeryDarkMan, tension has reached new heights over a dispute involving the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Bobrisky, whose real name is Idris Okuneye, has publicly responded to allegations raised by VeryDarkMan, accusing him of attempting to emotionally manipulate the situation. The conflict, which began with criticism of Bobrisky’s opulent lifestyle, has escalated, with VeryDarkMan reportedly suggesting that Bobrisky’s behavior may warrant scrutiny from the EFCC.
VeryDarkMan, a rising social commentator and activist, has been vocal about the extravagant lifestyles flaunted by Nigerian influencers like Bobrisky. He has frequently criticized what he sees as an endorsement of materialism, questioning the sources of their wealth. As these concerns gained momentum on social media, he seemed to direct his focus on Bobrisky, speculating whether such influencers might come under the radar of the EFCC for potential financial misconduct.
In response to these claims, Bobrisky has not remained silent. The crossdresser has addressed the situation head-on, dismissing VeryDarkMan’s allegations as baseless and manipulative. Taking to his social media platforms, Bobrisky accused VeryDarkMan of attempting to use emotional blackmail to garner sympathy and draw unnecessary attention to the situation.
In a pointed post, Bobrisky declared, Your emotional blackmail won’t work this time, clearly showing his unwillingness to back down or be intimidated by the ongoing allegations. He further elaborated that the accusations against him lack substance and appear to be motivated by jealousy or a desire for public attention. Bobrisky’s message was direct, suggesting that no amount of emotional appeal or public pressure would change the facts surrounding his lifestyle and financial dealings.
Bobrisky also took the opportunity to reinforce his reputation as a self-made individual, insisting that all his earnings are legitimate and derived from his influence and brand endorsements. He added that the EFCC has no reason to investigate him as there is no evidence of any illegal activity.
Social media has played a critical role in amplifying the feud between the two. Both Bobrisky and VeryDarkMan have large followings on platforms like Instagram and Twitter, which have become battlegrounds for their opposing viewpoints. While Bobrisky’s followers often praise his lavish lifestyle, which includes expensive cars, designer clothes, and luxurious homes, VeryDarkMan’s followers have supported his call for greater transparency and accountability.
As the debate rages on, it highlights a larger conversation within Nigerian society about wealth, fame, and the perceived disconnect between influencers and the realities of the average Nigerian. Many have sided with VeryDarkMan, agreeing that influencers should be more accountable for how they project their wealth in a country grappling with economic challenges. Others, however, see Bobrisky as a success story and argue that his lifestyle choices are a reflection of his hard work and ability to capitalize on his personal brand.
While the EFCC has yet to make any official statement regarding the accusations against Bobrisky, the institution remains a prominent figure in Nigerian law enforcement, tasked with investigating financial crimes such as money laundering, fraud, and other economic offenses. If the situation escalates further and concrete evidence of wrongdoing emerges, there is the possibility that the EFCC may look into the matter. For now, though, Bobrisky appears confident that he has nothing to fear and views the allegations as unfounded attempts to tarnish his reputation.
Public opinion remains divided as the feud unfolds. Some have commended Bobrisky for defending himself and not bowing to what they perceive as unfair scrutiny. Others believe that VeryDarkMan’s concerns are valid and reflect a larger issue of unchecked wealth among Nigerian influencers.
The next steps in the saga are uncertain. Bobrisky has made it clear that he intends to continue living his life on his terms, while VeryDarkMan has hinted that he may continue his campaign for more accountability from public figures.
In the coming days, more developments are likely to emerge, especially if the EFCC decides to comment or take action based on VeryDarkMan’s claims. Until then, the Nigerian public remains glued to the unfolding drama, eagerly waiting to see who will have the last word in this high-stakes social media showdown.
Ennywealth
