President William Ruto’s plan to build a massive church within the State House compound has triggered a nationwide debate, with critics questioning the constitutional, economic, and ethical implications of the project.
The proposed sanctuary, estimated to cost Sh1.2 billion, is set to accommodate up to 8,000 worshippers and will feature grand architectural elements including stained-glass windows, prayer rooms, office spaces, and LED-lit galleries. Designed by Skair Architects, the church will replace what the president described as a “mabati” (iron-sheet) structure that currently serves as a place of worship for staff and guests at the presidential residence.
Speaking at a recent event, President Ruto defended the decision, stating that the church will be funded through personal resources and private contributions — not public funds. “I came in and found a mabati church. Does that befit State House?” he said. “I am not apologizing for upgrading the House of God.”
However, the announcement has drawn sharp criticism from members of the public, civil society groups, and some political leaders who argue that the project is not only a misplacement of priorities but may also violate Kenya’s secular constitution. Article 8 of the Constitution states that there shall be no state religion, raising questions about the appropriateness of building such a large religious structure at the heart of the nation’s executive offices.
Lawmakers such as MP Peter Salasya have openly challenged the plan, warning that it sets a dangerous precedent by blurring the line between church and state. “The president does not represent only Christians. This is a secular nation,” Salasya stated.
Many Kenyans, already grappling with economic hardships, rising taxes, and underfunded public services, have taken to social media to express outrage over the project’s cost. They argue that the funds whether public or private could be better used to support healthcare, education, or job creation.
Despite the backlash, State House has not issued an official statement addressing the concerns. Construction timelines and additional project details remain unclear.
The move has ignited a broader national conversation about the role of religion in governance, transparency in leadership, and the ethical responsibilities of elected officials in times of economic strain.
